Executive Summary: The Anatomy of a Polycrisis
As of February 1, 2026, the South Asian security architecture has degraded into its most volatile configuration in over two decades. The region is no longer characterized merely by the binary hostility of the Indo-Pakistani rivalry or the creeping strategic competition between India and China. Instead, it faces a synchronized "polycrisis"—a convergence of ecological weaponization, conventional military escalation, internal regime collapses, and asymmetric proxy warfare—that has removed traditional firebreaks against major conflict.
The defining strategic development of the preceding year was the transition from managed containment to active compellence on the Indo-Pakistani front. The events of May 2025, specifically Operation Sindoor, shattered the long-standing ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC) and established a new precedent for the use of air power in sub-conventional disputes.1 More ominously, the subsequent suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) by India has introduced an existential dimension to the conflict, shifting the casus belli from territorial control of Kashmir to the hydro-security of the Indus basin.2
Simultaneously, the eastern theater involving Bangladesh and Myanmar has become a zone of acute instability. With general elections scheduled for February 12, 2026, Bangladesh stands on the precipice of a violent internal rupture or military intervention, driven by the breakdown of the post-Hasina interim order.4 The "Hadi Effect"—the radicalization of street politics following the death of student leaders—has rendered the political environment toxic, creating a vacuum that external actors are poised to exploit.
On the Himalayan frontier, the "disengagement" narratives regarding the Line of Actual Control (LAC) are contradicted by satellite intelligence confirming the permanent entrenchment of Chinese military-civil fusion assets. The construction of dual-use "Xiaokang" villages and the acceleration of the 1,840-kilometer Arunachal Frontier Highway by India indicate that both nuclear-armed neighbors are preparing for a protracted, militarized standoff rather than a diplomatic resolution.6
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of these threat vectors. Leveraging intelligence on troop dispositions, missile tests, diplomatic ruptures, and socio-political upheavals, it forecasts the trajectory of conflict in South Asia through 2026 and 2027.
1. The Indo-Pakistani Theatre: The Weaponization of Water and Air
The strategic stability of the subcontinent has fundamentally altered following the breakdown of the "cold peace" that characterized the 2021–2024 period. The relationship has regressed into a state of active hostility, defined by the normalization of cross-border kinetic strikes and the erosion of the nuclear threshold.
1.1 Post-Operation Sindoor: The New Normal of Compellence
The military engagement of May 7–10, 2025, codenamed Operation Sindoor, was not an isolated skirmish but a doctrinal pivot by New Delhi. Triggered by the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam attack which resulted in the massacre of 26 tourists (mostly Hindus), India launched a calibrated but expansive air campaign targeting nine militant infrastructure sites deep within Pakistan-administered Kashmir and Punjab.1
1.1.1 Operational Analysis of the Air Campaign
The conflict, lasting approximately 88 hours, revealed critical asymmetries in the conventional capabilities of both the Indian Air Force (IAF) and the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). Unlike previous engagements, Operation Sindoor involved sustained sorties intended to degrade the adversary's integrated air defense system (IADS) rather than merely striking non-military terror camps.
Intelligence assessments indicate a complex tactical picture. In the opening phases (May 7–8), the PAF leveraged its localized air defense dominance to achieve tactical successes, reportedly downing multiple Indian aircraft, including a Rafale (serial number BS001) and a Mirage 2000.8 This initial success was driven by the PAF's aggressive use of Chinese-supplied J-10C fighters and the integration of electronic warfare assets.
However, the subsequent 48 hours witnessed a massive Indian counter-offensive that effectively suppressed the PAF’s defensive network. Indian strikes, utilizing BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles and French-supplied SCALP-EG stand-off weapons, successfully targeted key logistical nodes.
Sargodha Air Base: The runway intersections were struck, rendering the base temporarily inoperative for fixed-wing recovery operations.
Jacobabad Air Base: A direct hit on an F-16 maintenance hangar destroyed critical support infrastructure and cooling facilities required for advanced avionics maintenance.
Murid Air Base: This facility, serving as the hub for Pakistan’s Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) drone fleet, suffered significant damage to its command-and-control center.8
The degradation of these assets forced Islamabad to request a ceasefire by noon on May 10, 2025.8 The operational lesson drawn by Indian planners is that the "escalation dominance" previously theorized is achievable through the overwhelming application of stand-off precision munitions. Conversely, Pakistan's military establishment views this as a catastrophic failure of conventional deterrence, necessitating a reliance on asymmetric and nuclear responses.
1.1.2 The Erosion of the Line of Control (LoC)
In the six months following Operation Sindoor, the LoC has ceased to function as a regulated boundary. Heavy artillery shelling and small arms fire have become daily occurrences. The civilian population in border sectors such as Uri, Poonch, and Rajouri is living under constant bombardment, with local administration failing to provide adequate bunkers or overhead protection trenches.10
The introduction of loitering munitions and commercial drones adapted for combat has further complicated the tactical landscape. The use of drones for cross-border surveillance and payload delivery has blurred the lines between state and non-state action, allowing both militaries to engage in constant attrition warfare without formally declaring hostilities.12
1.2 The Hydro-Strategic Crisis: The Indus Waters Treaty in Abeyance
While the air war altered the military balance, the most profound threat to long-term regional stability is India's unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) on April 23, 2025.13 This move, unprecedented since the treaty's signing in 1960, has transformed water from a shared resource into a potent instrument of coercive diplomacy.
1.2.1 The Strategic Rationale of Suspension
India’s decision to hold the IWT in "abeyance" is driven by a convergence of security, economic, and ecological factors:
Punitive Coercion: The primary driver is the "blood and water cannot flow together" doctrine. New Delhi has explicitly linked the resumption of treaty obligations to the cessation of cross-border terrorism.3
Resource Sovereignty: Facing its own water stress and climate change variability, India is asserting "absolute sovereignty" over the river systems to maximize hydroelectric generation and irrigation potential in Jammu and Kashmir.
Diplomatic signaling: By suspending the treaty, India has signaled that it no longer accepts the World Bank-mediated dispute resolution mechanism, preferring bilateralism or unilateral action.14
1.2.2 Acceleration of the Chenab Cascade
Following the suspension, the Indian Ministry of Power issued strict deadlines in late 2025 and January 2026 to accelerate the construction of a cascade of hydroelectric projects on the Chenab River—a "Western River" allocated to Pakistan under the IWT for unrestricted flow.
Table 1: Strategic Hydropower Projects on the Chenab Basin (Status as of Feb 2026)
1.2.3 Pakistan’s "Desertification" Anxiety
For Pakistan, the acceleration of these projects is an existential threat. The Indus basin irrigation system underpins Pakistan’s agriculture, food security, and energy generation. The suspension of hydrological data sharing 14 creates an information black hole, leading Islamabad to assume the worst-case scenario: that India is filling reservoirs during critical planting seasons.
In January 2026, Pakistan’s representative to the UN Security Council, Zulfiqar Ali, explicitly warned that India’s actions seek "the desertification of Pakistan's ancient fertile plains." He categorized this as "water terrorism" and stated that Pakistan reserves the right to respond with "the same resolve" used against military aggression.3
This rhetoric suggests a dangerous lowering of the threshold for war. If Pakistan detects a significant reduction in water flow—whether due to Indian dam filling or climate-induced variability—it may face internal pressure to launch a military strike to capture or destroy the upstream infrastructure in Kishtwar before the dams become fully operational in late 2026. This "use it or lose it" dilemma creates a structural incentive for pre-emptive conflict.
1.3 Nuclear Signaling and Escalation Control
The erosion of conventional stability has placed immense strain on the nuclear deterrence framework of South Asia. The crisis of 2025–2026 has been characterized by "soft" nuclear signaling and the testing of dual-use delivery systems.
1.3.1 The Credibility Crisis and Doctrinal Shift
Both nations are grappling with a crisis of credibility regarding their nuclear postures.
India: The expansion of China’s nuclear arsenal to 600 warheads has forced India to modernize its triad. The successful testing of the K-4 Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) from the Arihant-class SSBNs in December 2025 signals a maturing second-strike capability.18 However, this modernization is viewed by Pakistan as a first-strike capability designed to neutralize its strategic assets.
Pakistan: Adhering to "Full Spectrum Deterrence," Pakistan has integrated tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) like the Nasr missile to counter Indian conventional thrusts. However, the failure of its air defense during Operation Sindoor raises doubts about the survivability of its land-based deterrent. In response, Pakistan has hinted at the development of long-range missiles capable of striking beyond South Asia, drawing concern from the United States regarding proliferation.19
1.3.2 The Entanglement Risk
The introduction of the Pralay quasi-ballistic missile by India (for conventional battlefield use) creates a dangerous entanglement with nuclear systems. Given that Pralay and nuclear-tipped missiles may share similar trajectories and launch signatures, a conventional strike using Pralay could be misidentified by Pakistani early warning systems as a nuclear first strike, potentially triggering an inadvertent nuclear retaliation.
2. The Sino-Indian Frontier: Infrastructure Race and Strategic Encirclement
While the India-Pakistan border remains kinetically active, the Line of Actual Control (LAC) between India and China is undergoing a structural hardening. Despite diplomatic announcements of "disengagement," the reality on the ground is one of permanent fortification and strategic encirclement.
2.1 The "Grey Zone" War: Villages as Fortresses
The most significant development along the LAC in late 2025 and early 2026 is the rapid expansion of China’s "Xiaokang" (moderately well-off) villages. Satellite imagery analysis confirms that these are not merely civilian settlements but dual-use military complexes designed to alter the demographic and security status quo.
2.1.1 Strategic Placement and Function
China has constructed over 600 such villages along the border, with significant activity observed near the disputed Pangong Tso in Ladakh and in the eastern sector (Arunachal Pradesh/Zangnan).20
Majiduncun and Zhuangnan: Satellite imagery identifies these specific villages as having expanded military infrastructure, including barracks, perimeter walls, and hardened communications towers.6
Operational Role: These settlements serve three functions:
Logistics: They act as forward storage and staging areas, reducing the logistical tail for PLA troops.
Surveillance: The inclusion of radomes and high-altitude observation posts integrates them into the PLA’s intelligence network.
Lawfare: By settling civilian populations in disputed territories, China strengthens its legal claim to sovereignty, complicating any future Indian attempts to recover these areas.
2.2 The Infrastructure Asymmetry
China maintains a significant lead in border infrastructure, enabling rapid force mobilization. The Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) railway network has expanded from 531 km in 2012 to over 1,118 km, with plans to reach 5,000 km by 2035.20 The upgrading of Shigatse Peace Airport—located just 150 km from the Indian border—allows for the rapid deployment of combat aircraft and drones.
India is attempting to close this gap through massive capital investment. The centerpiece of this effort is the Arunachal Frontier Highway, a 1,840-kilometer strategic road running parallel to the LAC. Construction on this $4.7 billion project accelerated in late 2025.7 Additionally, India has allocated over $3 billion for strategic railway lines in the border regions.21 This infrastructure race creates a classic security dilemma: every road built by India to improve its defensive posture is viewed by China as an offensive preparation, prompting further PLA fortification and raising the tension levels.
2.3 Maritime Encirclement: The String of Pearls 2.0
The conflict potential has expanded from the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), driven by Beijing's deepening defense ties with the Maldives and Sri Lanka.
2.3.1 The Maldives Pivot
Under President Mohamed Muizzu, the Maldives has decisively aligned itself with Beijing's security architecture. In January and February 2026, the Chinese research vessel Xiang Yang Hong 03 was scheduled to visit Malé, despite strenuous objections from New Delhi.22
Dual-Use Capabilities: While officially designated for oceanographic research, Indian defense officials classify vessels like the Xiang Yang Hong 03 as dual-use assets. They are capable of mapping the thermal layers and salinity of the Indian Ocean—data that is critical for the effective operation of submarines and underwater drones.24
Defense Agreements: The Maldives signed a military assistance agreement with China in March 2024, which is now bearing fruit in 2026 with the supply of non-lethal weapons and training.25 This marks a strategic rupture in the traditional Indian security umbrella over the archipelago.
2.3.2 Naval Exercises and Submarine Presence
The PLA Navy has increased its operational tempo in the IOR. In January 2026, China led the "Will for Peace 2026" naval exercises in South Africa, alongside Russia and Iran.27 The participation of advanced assets like the destroyer CNS Tangshan signals China's ability to project power far from its shores and form alternative security coalitions. Simultaneously, reports of Chinese submarines attempting to dock in Sri Lanka (despite a moratorium) indicate a persistent effort to normalize a subsurface presence in India’s maritime backyard.28
3. Bangladesh: The Impending Implosion
As of early February 2026, Bangladesh represents the most acute risk for immediate destabilization in South Asia. The country is days away from a critical general election on February 12, 2026, following the violent ouster of Sheikh Hasina in 2024. The political vacuum left by the collapse of the Awami League has not been filled by a stable democratic order but by a volatile mix of interim governance, radicalized street politics, and military oversight.
3.1 Election Violence and the "Hadi Effect"
The political climate in Dhaka and the districts is toxic. The interim government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus has struggled to restore public order. Since the announcement of the election schedule in December 2025, at least 16 political activists have been killed.5
The violence has been catalyzed by the "Hadi Effect"—a phenomenon named after student leader Sharif Osman Hadi, whose death in late 2025 galvanized opposition forces but also triggered widespread reprisal attacks.
Communal Violence: The breakdown of law and order has disproportionately affected minority communities. Between August 2024 and June 2025, over 2,400 incidents of communal violence were documented, including the looting of 5,763 firearms from police stations, many of which remain unrecovered.29
Targeting of Institutions: The violence has extended to the media and judiciary. The offices of major newspapers like The Daily Star and Prothom Alo were torched following Hadi's death 31, signaling an erosion of the civil liberties necessary for a free election.
3.2 The Specter of Military Intervention
The Bangladesh Army has effectively been policing the streets for nearly 18 months, operating under orders that grant them magisterial powers.4
Deployment Scale: For the February 12 election, approximately 100,000 troops are expected to be deployed nationwide.4
The Intervention Risk: While Army Chief General Waker-uz-Zaman has publicly stated that politics is "not our cup of tea," the institutional reality suggests otherwise. The military remains the only cohesive institution in the country. If the election results are contested violently, or if the winning coalition (likely a BNP-Jamaat alliance) initiates a campaign of mass retribution against former regime loyalists, the military may feel compelled to intervene directly.
The "Caretaker" Scenario: Analysts fear a "1/11" style intervention (referencing the 2007 takeover), where the military establishes a long-term technocratic government to prevent state collapse. This would indefinitely suspend the democratic transition and could trigger sanctions from Western nations, further isolating the economy.
Table 3: Bangladesh Election Security Indicators (Jan–Feb 2026)
3.3 The Myanmar Spillover
Compounding the internal chaos is the deteriorating situation on the Myanmar border. The Arakan Army's seizure of Rakhine State has pushed Rohingya armed groups into Bangladesh. Intelligence indicates that these groups are recruiting from refugee camps in Cox's Bazar to fight in Myanmar, while weapons are flowing back into Bangladesh, fueling local crime and political violence.32 The destabilization of the border districts adds another layer of complexity for the Bangladeshi military, forcing it to split its attention between election security and border defense.
4. The Western Front: Pakistan’s Internal and External Siege
Pakistan is facing a "polycrisis" that undermines its ability to act as a rational state actor. The convergence of political illegitimacy, economic insolvency, and a two-front insurgency has created a highly combustible environment.
4.1 The Afghan Dilemma and the Durand Line
Relations with the Taliban-ruled Afghanistan have hit a nadir. The Durand Line is no longer a regulated border but an active battlefront.
Cross-Border Strikes: In late 2025, Pakistan conducted airstrikes inside Afghanistan (targeting Kabul, Khost, and Paktika) to eliminate Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) leaders.34 This marked a shift from defensive posturing to pre-emptive cross-border operations.
Taliban Retaliation: The Afghan Taliban responded with attacks on Pakistani border posts. Recurring skirmishes at Chaman and Spin Boldak disrupt trade and inflict casualties on both sides.36
TTP Resurgence: The TTP has established a parallel governance structure in parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, collecting taxes and administering justice.38 This loss of writ in border regions forces the Pakistan Army to commit significant resources to the west, limiting its ability to mobilize against India in the east.
4.2 Internal Fracture: The PTI Factor
Domestically, the continued imprisonment of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and the crackdown on his party (PTI) have created a permanent state of civil unrest. The withdrawal of PTI from negotiations in January 2026 suggests a return to street agitation.39 Rumors of "Martial Law" persist as the civilian government relies entirely on the military establishment for survival.40
Economic Impact: The political instability exacerbates the economic crisis. Pakistan is heavily dependent on external loans to avoid default, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif publicly admitting shame over the country's "begging" status.41 This economic weakness paradoxically increases the risk of conflict, as weak governments often ramp up anti-India rhetoric or allow increased militant activity in Kashmir to divert domestic anger (diversionary war theory).
5. The Himalayan Buffer: Nepal’s "Gen Z" Uprising
Nepal, traditionally a quiet buffer state, underwent a radical political transformation in late 2025 that has significant geopolitical implications.
5.1 The September Uprising
On September 8, 2025, a leaderless movement driven by "Gen Z" protesters—mobilized via digital platforms—erupted across Nepal. Triggered initially by a social media ban, the protests rapidly evolved into an anti-corruption revolution.
Violence and Collapse: The protests resulted in the burning of the Parliament building in Kathmandu and the deaths of at least 75 civilians.42 The violence forced the resignation of the pro-China Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli.
Interim Government: An interim administration led by former Chief Justice Sushila Karki—Nepal's first female head of government—was installed to oversee elections scheduled for March 5, 2026.44
5.2 Geopolitical Tug-of-War
The instability in Nepal opens space for intense external interference.
India's Role: India has rushed to support the interim government, providing 600 vehicles and logistical support for the upcoming election.46 A stable, democratic Nepal is viewed by New Delhi as a critical buffer against Chinese influence.
China's Concerns: Beijing views the "color revolution" nature of the uprising—driven by digital platforms and youth—as a threat to its own stability in Tibet. China is closely monitoring the situation to ensure the new government does not deviate from the "One China" policy regarding Tibetan refugees.46
A chaotic election in March 2026 could lead to violent factionalism, inviting proxy interventions from both neighbors and transforming Nepal from a buffer into a battleground.
6. Strategic Analysis: Probability of Major Conflict
Based on the synthesis of intelligence from all theaters, the risk of military conflict in 2026 can be categorized into three distinct scenarios.
Scenario A: The Water War (High Probability)
Trigger: India aggressively fills the Pakal Dul or Kiru dams (late 2026) during a lean flow period, or permanently revokes the IWT.
Mechanism: Pakistan, facing immediate agricultural collapse ("desertification"), launches "surgical strikes" or sabotage operations against the dam infrastructure in Kishtwar.
Escalation: India activates the "Cold Start" doctrine to seize territory in Punjab or Sindh as a bargaining chip. Pakistan threatens the use of Tactical Nuclear Weapons (TNWs) against Indian armored formations.
Indicators: The current "act of war" rhetoric at the UN and the accelerated construction timelines for the dams are flashing red indicators for this scenario.
Scenario B: The Accidental Nuclear Exchange (Medium Probability)
Trigger: A mass-casualty terrorist attack similar to Pahalgam occurs in early 2026.
Mechanism: India launches "Operation Sindoor II" with greater intensity, targeting high-value Pakistani military assets. Pakistan’s air defense, degraded in 2025, fails to intercept incoming missiles. Fearing a "counter-force" strike on its nuclear arsenal, a local Pakistani commander authorizes the launch of a Nasr missile or a conventional missile that is misidentified by India as nuclear.
Escalation: Full strategic nuclear exchange.
Indicators: The blurring of conventional and nuclear delivery systems (Pralay/Nasr) and the "use it or lose it" pressures on Pakistan's military due to conventional inferiority.
Scenario C: The Bangladesh Intervention (Medium-High Probability)
Trigger: Mass violence following the Feb 12, 2026 election, with the losing side rejecting the results.
Mechanism: Widespread pogroms against minorities or political opponents ensue. The Bangladesh Army takes over to restore order but faces internal fractures.
Ripple Effect: If the violence generates a massive refugee outflow to India (similar to 1971), India may feel compelled to intervene militarily to establish a "safe zone" inside Bangladesh. This would draw condemnation from China and potentially open a second front for India if Pakistan takes advantage of the distraction.
7. Global Geopolitical Overlays
7.1 United States Policy (Trump 2.0)
The U.S. National Security Strategy (2025) under the second Trump administration prioritizes economic nationalism over traditional alliances.47
Tariff Impact: The imposition of tariffs on both India and China disrupts the economic stability of the region, potentially reducing the budget available for military modernization but also increasing nationalist rhetoric to divert domestic economic grievances.47
Diplomatic Disengagement: The U.S. is unlikely to intervene diplomatically in an Indo-Pak crisis with the same vigor as in 2019 or 2002. The transactional approach suggests Washington will only engage if its direct interests (e.g., Diego Garcia, freedom of navigation) are threatened.
7.2 China's Global Security Initiative (GSI)
Beijing is preparing for the long game. Its "Will for Peace 2026" exercises with Russia and Iran demonstrate its ability to form alternative security coalitions that exclude the West.27 In a South Asian conflict, China would likely support Pakistan with intelligence, cyber warfare, and diplomatic cover at the UN, while using the distraction to consolidate its gains along the LAC and in the Maldives.
Conclusion
The possibility of military conflict among South Asian countries in the near future is extremely high. The region has moved beyond the era of "stable instability." The systemic checks that prevented war in the past—treaties like the IWT, robust conventional deterrence, and strong U.S. diplomatic intervention—have all eroded simultaneously.
Key Watch Dates:
February 12, 2026: Bangladesh General Elections (Flashpoint for civil war/intervention).
March 5, 2026: Nepal General Elections (Political stability test).
December 2026: Scheduled commissioning of Indian dams on the Chenab (Trigger for Pakistan).
The next 12 to 24 months will likely witness either a major limited war between India and Pakistan over water and terrorism or a significant internal collapse in Bangladesh that reshapes the regional map. Observers must look beyond traditional military indicators and monitor river flow data, refugee movements, and cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure as the precursors to the next conflict.
Works cited
Conflict Between India and Pakistan | Global Conflict Tracker, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-between-india-and-pakistan
Indus Waters Treaty's suspension risks other world treaties: Pakistan - Dunya News, accessed February 1, 2026, https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/932832-indus-waters-treatys-suspension-risks-other-world-treaties-pakista
At UN, Pakistan vows to prevent desertification of its fertile plains - Dawn, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.dawn.com/news/1969476
Bangladesh election: Is the military still a power behind the scenes ..., accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/1/29/bangladesh-election-is-the-military-still-a-power-behind-the-scenes
'Frightening situation': Bangladesh elections haunted by political violence - Al Jazeera, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/1/27/fear-and-hope-in-bangladesh-how-political-violence-is-haunting-elections
China Is Upgrading Dual-Use Villages along Its Disputed Indian Border, accessed February 1, 2026, https://chinapower.csis.org/analysis/china-upgrading-dual-use-xiaokang-villages-india-border/
Infrastructure race accelerates at India-China border - Indo-Pacific Defense FORUM, accessed February 1, 2026, https://ipdefenseforum.com/2026/01/infrastructure-race-accelerates-at-india-china-border/
How Pakistan Failed To Follow Through On Its Initial Success In ..., accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.eurasiareview.com/28012026-how-pakistan-failed-to-follow-through-on-its-initial-success-in-operation-sindoor-oped/
2025 India–Pakistan crisis - Wikipedia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_crisis
Exclusive: Six months after Op Sindoor, border villages in ruins, await bunkers - India Today, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/six-months-after-op-sindoor-line-of-control-shelling-uri-border-villages-no-bunkers-ground-report-2822513-2025-11-19
Op Sindoor: Poonch digs in, wants bunkers on priority | Hindustan Times, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/chandigarh-news/op-sindoor-poonch-digs-in-wants-bunkers-on-priority-101751136558344.html
Lessons for the next India-Pakistan war | Brookings, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/lessons-for-the-next-india-pakistan-war/
India-Pakistan Conflict in Spring 2025 - Congress.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13000
Embargoed Not to be published, broadcast or posted before 2nd February 2026 PR No. 6 Message of President Asif Ali Zardari on World Wetlands Day 2 February 2026 Islamabad: February 1, 2026 - PID, accessed February 1, 2026, https://pid.gov.pk/site/press_detail/31781
India Speeds Up Chenab Dams With 2026 Deadline, Spotlight on Pakistan Water Flow, accessed February 1, 2026, https://thecsrjournal.in/india-speeds-up-chenab-dams-with-2026-deadline-spotlight-on-pakistan-water-flow/
Ratle Hydroelectric Plant - Wikipedia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratle_Hydroelectric_Plant
Indus Water Treaty put on hold, government clears another Chenab hydel project, accessed February 1, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indus-water-treaty-put-on-hold-government-clears-another-chenab-hydel-project/articleshow/126220007.cms
India, Pakistan advance a diverse range of missiles - Naval Technology, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.naval-technology.com/features/india-pakistan-advance-a-diverse-range-of-missiles/
Pakistan's New Long-Range Missile Development | Congress.gov, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13086
China expands military infrastructure near India - The Tribune, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/world/china-expands-military-infrastructure-near-india/
India Reshapes Military Geography Along China Border As Infrastructure Race Accelerates: A Look At Strategic Projects, accessed February 1, 2026, https://zeenews.india.com/india/india-reshapes-military-geography-along-china-border-as-infrastructure-race-accelerates-a-look-at-strategic-projects-3006579.html
Controversial Chinese Research Vessel Schedules Port Call in Maldives, accessed February 1, 2026, https://maritime-executive.com/article/controversial-chinese-research-vessel-schedules-port-call-in-maldives
Maldives rules out Research by Chinese Vessel in its Waters, accessed February 1, 2026, https://vajiramandravi.com/current-affairs/maldives-chinese-vessels/
Maldives visit of Chinese survey ship could rouse Indian Ocean security concerns, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/maldives-visit-of-chinese-survey-ship-could-rouse-indian-ocean-security-concerns/72886135
Maldives-China defence agreement to obtain non-lethal weapons and training, says President Muizzu - The Economic Times, accessed February 1, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/maldives-china-defence-agreement-to-obtain-non-lethal-weapons-and-training-says-president-muizzu/articleshow/108271962.cms
China's Defence Diplomacy in South Asia: Key Developments in 2024 - NatStrat, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.natstrat.org/articledetail/publications/china-s-defence-diplomacy-in-south-asia-key-developments-in-186.html
Chinese, Russian, Iranian Warships Gather Near South Africa for Multilateral Drill, accessed February 1, 2026, https://news.usni.org/2026/01/09/chinese-russian-iranian-warships-gather-near-south-africa-for-multilateral-drill
Submarine Unit joining first combat-oriented drill of 2026 - YouTube, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/fcZc8MS5LSs
Bangladesh Faces Turmoil As Elections And Violence Loom - Grand Pinnacle Tribune, accessed February 1, 2026, https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/bangladesh-faces-turmoil-as-elections-and-violence-loom-487887
Divisions fueling violence as Bangladesh nears crucial elections - Anadolu, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/divisions-fueling-violence-as-bangladesh-nears-crucial-elections/3815233
Bangladesh: Amnesty Chief Calls for Human Rights Guarantees During Election Period in Open Letter to Muhammad Yunus, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.amnestyusa.org/press-releases/bangladesh-amnesty-chief-calls-for-human-rights-guarantees-during-election-period-in-open-letter-to-muhammad-yunus/
On the Horizon: November 2025-April 2026 | International Crisis Group, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.crisisgroup.org/bangladesh-democratic-republic-congo-lebanon-south-sudan/horizon-november-2025-april-2026
Bangladesh/Myanmar: The Dangers of a Rohingya Insurgency | International Crisis Group, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.crisisgroup.org/rpt/asia/south-east-asia/myanmar-bangladesh/348-bangladeshmyanmar-dangers-rohingya-insurgency
Is Pakistan’s hard line on terrorism a strategic cul-de-sac?, accessed February 1, 2026, https://eastasiaforum.org/2026/01/31/is-pakistans-hard-line-on-terrorism-a-strategic-cul-de-sac/
2025 Afghanistan–Pakistan conflict - Wikipedia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Afghanistan%E2%80%93Pakistan_conflict
Axis of security crisis in South Asia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.orissapost.com/axis-of-security-crisis-in-south-asia/
Pakistani, Afghan forces exchange deadly border fire: What's next? - Al Jazeera, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/12/afghanistan-pakistan-border-clashes-what-we-know-so-far
2026 terrorism trends amid an evolving global terrorism landscape ..., accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.wtwco.com/en-gb/insights/2026/01/terrorism-2026-evolving-global-terrorism-landscape-amid-fragmentation-and-strategic-drift
Pakistan's political deadlock deepens as PTI withdraws from negotiations - Al Jazeera, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/24/pakistans-political-deadlock-deepens-as-pti-withdraws-from-negotiations
Human Rights Council Adopts Resolution Extending Mandates of Fact-Finding Mission and Special Rapporteur on Iran and Calling for an Urgent Investigation into Human Rights Violations in Iran in the Context of the Protests Beginning 28 December 2025 | OHCHR, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.ohchr.org/en/media-advisories/2026/01/human-rights-council-adopts-resolution-extending-mandates-fact-finding
'Ashamed to beg': Shehbaz Sharif details the lengths he and Army chief Munir went to keep Pakistan afloat - The Economic Times, accessed February 1, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/ashamed-to-beg-shehbaz-sharif-details-the-lengths-he-and-army-chief-munir-went-to-keep-pakistan-afloat/articleshow/127816855.cms
The 2025 Gen Z Uprising in Nepal: A Three-Part Analysis, accessed February 1, 2026, https://hsph.harvard.edu/atrocity-prevention-lab/news/the-2025-gen-z-uprising-in-nepal-a-three-part-analysis/
The awakening of the Gen Z across Asia: Common patterns and possible implications. Global Affairs. University of Navarra, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/the-awakening-of-the-gen-z-across-asia-common-patterns-and-possible-implications
Diplomatic Briefing by the Rt. Hon. Mrs. Sushila Karki, Prime Minister and the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Nepal, to the Diplomatic Corp in Kathmandu | Ministry Of Foreign Affairs, accessed February 1, 2026, https://mofa.gov.np/content/1680/diplomatic-briefing-by-the-rt--hon--mrs-/
Karki interim cabinet - Wikipedia, accessed February 1, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karki_interim_cabinet
Political Flux in Nepal: Strategic Adjustments by India and China - South Asian Voices, accessed February 1, 2026, https://southasianvoices.org/geo-m-in-r-nepal-india-china-flux-01-26-2026/
Top Ten Global Risks for 2026 - Stimson Center, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.stimson.org/2026/top-ten-global-risks-for-2026/
National Security Strategy | The White House, accessed February 1, 2026, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf